How to pick the right experience type
The decision logic for choosing which experience type fits your campaign.
Table of Contents
Don't start with "which experience type should I pick?" — start with "what am I trying to accomplish?" The job determines the experience type, not the other way around. This article walks through that logic: what outcome you're driving, who the audience is, and what level of interruption fits the moment.
What the campaign builder can help create today: in-product experiences (Flows, Pins, Embeds, Checklists, Launchpads, Banners). Email, push, and Workflows aren’t part of the initial campaign product or Appcues AI building capabilities yet — where this article mentions them, treat them as a manual, separate setup, not something the AI can build for you.
Start with the job, not the type
Don't ask "which experience type?" first — ask "what are we trying to accomplish?" The job determines the type. Here's the mapping to use:
| Job | First choice | Also consider | Avoid |
|---|---|---|---|
| New feature awareness | Pin badge on entry point | Inline Embed on relevant page | Modal (unless time-sensitive) |
| Time-sensitive announcement | Modal or Slideout | Slideout with skip-to-action | Embed (too quiet) |
| Single action, one screen | Single Tooltip (no button) | Single Tooltip with button | Multi-step Flow |
| Multi-step activation across screens | Welcome Modal → Tooltip tour → Checklist | Slideout intro + Flow | 3+ step single Flow |
| Reminder for a dismissed action | Embed on relevant page | Pin with opt-in CTA | Repeat Modal |
| Early dormancy signal | Contextual Tooltip on next session | "You left off here" Embed | Modal |
| User already gone (dormant) | Email + Tooltip on return | Slideout on return | In-product only |
| Nudge toward a related feature | Behavioral Slideout ("tried X? try Y") | Pin on adjacent feature | Modal |
| Expansion or upgrade | Slideout with CTA to schedule/chat | Pin with upgrade CTA | Forced Modal |
| Empty-state paywall | Embed in empty state | Slideout | Modal |
| Help or resource hub | Launchpad | — | Multiple competing centers |
| Training / education re-entry | Launchpad + tour recall | Resource center Embeds | One-shot tour with no recall |
| Feedback collection | Inline Embed survey | Slideout survey | Modal blocking workflow |
Why lighter experience types come first
Lean toward less interruptive experience types — Pins, Embeds, Tooltips — unless you have a reason to go louder. Here's the logic:
- Modals demand immediate attention. Reserve them for time-sensitive or strategically critical moments — users came to your product to do something, and a Modal can feel like an obstacle.
- Slideouts are the middle ground — more attention than a Pin, less takeover than a Modal. Reach for these when the user needs to know something now but doesn't need to stop everything.
- Pins persist. They let users engage when they're ready, not when you're ready. Default here for awareness — persistence beats interruption for most new-feature launches.
- Embeds sit inline with the page content. They're the most underused experience type, and the one worth reaching for most often for re-entry, reminders, and feature launches — they feel native to the product rather than bolted on.
- Tooltips point at exactly where to act. Use them for contained, single-screen actions where the user already knows what to do — they should interact with the product, not the Tooltip.
When to sequence multiple experiences
A single experience is enough when the action is contained to one screen and one step. For anything larger, sequence experiences across multiple tactics.
The rule: if the action spans multiple pages or takes more than one session to complete, sequence it. Vary the experience type within the sequence, too — three Flows in a row creates fatigue; a Flow followed by a Pin followed by an Embed creates rhythm.
A typical sequence has three beats:
- Discovery — a Modal or Slideout announces something exists
- Action — a Tooltip-led tour guides the user through doing it
- Follow-up — a Pin, Embed, or email re-engages users who didn't convert
Experience types to steer away from
Be cautious reaching for these, even when they seem like the obvious choice:
- Flows longer than 3–5 steps — break these into shorter sequences with re-entry instead of one long walkthrough
- Hotspots — Pins are the modern version; use a Pin anywhere you'd previously have reached for a Hotspot
- Banners — Embeds or Slideouts outperform them for most use cases
- A Modal as the default starting point — start with the lightest experience type that fits the urgency, and go louder only if you need to
- A Checklist and a floating Launchpad running at the same time — graduate from one to the other instead of running both
The "AND not OR" principle
Combine quiet experiences with loud ones rather than choosing between them:
- A Modal plus an Embed — the Modal carries discovery; the Embed remains for users who skipped or came back later
- A Flow plus a Launchpad recall — the Flow tries; the Launchpad gives users a way back
- An email plus an in-product Tooltip on next session — the email is the exit fallback; the Tooltip is the welcome-back
If you find yourself planning two experiences where you expected one, this is why — you're building a recovery path alongside the primary path.
Every campaign gets a re-entry path
Always include a way for users who dismiss or skip an experience to come back to it later. This typically means:
- Tracking who dismissed so they can be targeted separately
- A follow-up in another channel (email via Workflows, or an in-product nudge on the next session)
- A recall mechanism, like a Launchpad item
Don't ship a one-shot interruption with no recovery path.